Close

Flagship Disasters

The Wrong Bolts — Windscreen Blowout at 17,300 Feet

Concept visualization for The Wrong Bolts — Windscreen Blowout at 17,300 Feet

The shift manager picked the bolts by eye, in bad light, from an uncontrolled carousel — 84 of 90 were too thin. Twenty-seven hours later the windscreen blew out with the captain half through it. He lived.

Warning condition

night shift, ~0300–0500, 9 June 1990, Birmingham

27 HOURS

If uncorrected

10 June 1990, 0733 hrs, climbing through 17,300 ft over Didcot

Read the official report: AAIB AAR 1/92 (EW/C1165)
ATA 56flight-deck windscreen and frame attachmentFatigueNormsComplacencyLack Of Resources
What happened

A BAC One-Eleven's left windscreen was replaced overnight by the Shift Maintenance Manager working alone. He selected the securing bolts by matching them to the old ones by touch and eye at an uncontrolled parts carousel in poor light, instead of looking up the part number. 84 of the 90 bolts he fitted were 0.026 inch too small in diameter, and 6 were 0.1 inch too short. On the next morning's passenger flight, as cabin pressure built, the windscreen blew out of its frame — and the commander was sucked halfway out of the aircraft. Cabin crew held him by the legs until the copilot landed at Southampton. He survived.

Why it matters

A safety-critical task was done by one person who also certified his own work — the AAIB's first causal factor. The windscreen was not designated a "Vital Point," so no independent check was required, and the installation's first real test was a pressurized passenger flight. The fix the industry drew from this: duplicate inspection of safety-critical work, controlled parts stores, and never certifying your own critical task — pillars of today's Part-145 human-factors requirements.

Control sequence
  1. Identify the fastener by part number from the Illustrated Parts Catalogue — never by eye-matching the old bolt.
  2. Draw stock from the controlled, labeled store; an unlabeled carousel is not a source of aircraft parts.
  3. Install and torque to the maintenance manual, with adequate lighting and the right access equipment.
  4. Safety-critical work gets an independent (duplicate) inspection before certification — never self-certified.
  5. Prove the installation before it carries passengers — the first pressurization must not happen on a revenue flight.
How often

Frequency of this exact failure is not quantified in public sources — but incorrect installation of components sits at the top of the industry's recurring maintenance-error listings (UK CAA / Boeing MEDA canon; exact citation locked at the corpus gate).

Consequences

The left windscreen departed at 17,300 feet; explosive decompression; the commander was partially ejected and pinned against the airframe for over 20 minutes while cabin crew restrained him by the legs. Serious injuries to the commander (fractures to the right arm and wrist, broken left thumb, bruising, frostbite, shock), minor injuries to one steward. Zero fatalities; the aircraft landed safely at Southampton (AAIB AAR 1/92).

Evidence gate: publish only after verification

  • 84 of the 90 securing bolts were 0.026 inch smaller in diameter than specified; the other 6 were 0.1 inch too short. (AAIB AAR 1/92, finding viii) (AAIB AAR 1/92, finding viii)cited
  • The windscreen was fitted 27 hours before the accident flight; the aircraft had not flown in between. (AAIB AAR 1/92, finding vii) (AAIB AAR 1/92, finding vii)cited
  • The work was done and self-certified by the same Shift Maintenance Manager; no independent check, and the task was not designated a "Vital Point". (AAIB AAR 1/92, causal factor i) (AAIB AAR 1/92, causal factor i)cited

ExperienceLearn it, live it

Coming soon

EON Life Simulation

Walk into the accident and practise freely, no score. The physics decides, unscripted.

Checking your score

Assessment & certificateProven under pressure