Close

Powerplant & APU

The Latches Nobody Checked — Fire Over Heathrow

Concept visualization for The Latches Nobody Checked — Fire Over Heathrow

Two tired technicians left the fan cowl doors unlatched on both engines — then serviced the wrong aircraft and signed the job off. At rotation all four doors ripped away, a fuel pipe tore open, and the right engine burned all the way back to Heathrow.

Warning condition

night shift, 23–24 May 2013, Heathrow Terminal 5 — fan cowls opened from about 2140 and left unlatched

THE NEXT DAY

If uncorrected

24 May 2013, 0716 hrs UTC, on takeoff from Runway 27L, Heathrow

Read the official report: AAIB AAR 1/2015 (EW/C2013/05/02)
ATA 71engine fan cowl doorsFatigueComplacencyNormsLack Of Awareness
What happened

During overnight checks, two technicians opened the fan cowl doors on both engines of an A319 to inspect the IDG oil levels, found both IDGs low, and lowered the doors onto their hold-open devices — unlatched — intending to return with an oil gun. No warning notice went in the cockpit, no open entry went in the technical log for the low oil. Hours later they drove back, but to the wrong stand: an identical-looking A321. They did not check the registration. Finding that aircraft's cowls latched and its IDG oil full, they rationalized both surprises, latched what they had opened, and signed off G-EUOE's Weekly Check. The real G-EUOE flew the next morning with all eight latches disengaged — a condition neither the tug driver's inspection nor the co-pilot's walk-around caught. At rotation all four fan cowl doors tore off, striking slats, fuselage, landing gear and pylons; on the return approach, fuel leaking from a damaged fuel pipe on the right engine ignited. The crew shut the engine down, landed, and evacuated all 80 occupants by slide.

Why it matters

The AAIB found two causal factors: the technicians' non-compliance with the AMM procedures that left the doors unlatched, and the failure of both pre-departure inspections to detect it (AAIB AAR 1/2015 §3b). Behind them sat fatigue — the investigation's first Safety Recommendation demanded a fatigue risk management system for Part-145 organisations — plus an interrupted task with no log entry to protect it, and an aircraft-swap error that turned a deferred job into a signed-off one. It is the definitive card for task interruption, work resumption discipline, and the limits of the walk-around as a safety net.

Control sequence
  1. Follow the AMM opening procedure to the letter — including the cockpit warning notice that tells the next person the cowls are open.
  2. An interrupted task gets an open technical log entry the moment it is deferred; an unrecorded open job does not exist for anyone else.
  3. On returning to a job, positively identify the aircraft by registration before touching it — never by stand, silhouette or habit.
  4. Close-up means latching every latch and verifying each one — and anomalies that "must have been someone else" are stop signs, not reassurance.
  5. The walk-around checks fan cowl latches deliberately: crouch to see them — flush doors with latches hanging low are exactly what an unlatched cowl looks like.
How often

Between 2002 and 2013 the A320-family fleet suffered fan cowl door losses at about one event per 2.42 million flight cycles — roughly half the 1992–2002 rate, but persisting after two rounds of airworthiness action (AAIB AAR 1/2015 §1.18.2).

Consequences

All four fan cowl doors detached at rotation, damaging slats, wing skin, fuselage, the left main gear's brake pipe and both engine pylons; the right pylon primary structure was severely buckled. On final approach a damaged fuel pipe on the right engine fed an external fire; the engine was shut down, the aircraft landed on Runway 27R and stopped, the fire was extinguished, and all occupants evacuated by the left-side slides without serious injury (AAIB AAR 1/2015 Summary, §1.1.9, §1.2, §1.3).

Evidence gate: publish only after verification

  • 34 fan cowl door losses had already occurred on A320-family aircraft before this one; three more since brought the total to 38. (AAIB AAR 1/2015 §1.18.2) (AAIB AAR 1/2015 §1.18.2)cited
  • Both the pushback tug driver's inspection and the co-pilot's walk-around missed the unlatched doors on both engines — the report's second causal factor. (AAIB AAR 1/2015 §3b) (AAIB AAR 1/2015 §3b)cited
  • Technician A had worked four 12-hour day shifts and eight 12-hour night shifts in the 14 days before the error. (AAIB AAR 1/2015 §1.5.6) (AAIB AAR 1/2015 §1.5.6)cited

ExperienceLearn it, live it

Coming soon

EON Life Simulation

Walk into the accident and practise freely, no score. The physics decides, unscripted.

Checking your score

Assessment & certificateProven under pressure